The Hidden Truth About Banking and Inequality
Written on
Chapter 1: The Banking Dilemma
Consider how frequently you rely on credit cards or banking applications in your everyday life. You might think, “It’s not that significant.” However, we often overlook how integral banking is to our routines.
But what if I told you that in some nations, opening a bank account is nearly impossible? In fact, inadequate identity verification systems in certain countries make this a reality. Those of us in developed nations tend to take for granted the financial products and services that are luxuries elsewhere.
But why is this disparity so pronounced? The answer is complex. What if I told you that one of the primary tools regulators use to shield society from crime is simultaneously a leading cause of financial exclusion worldwide? The same laws designed to protect us often exacerbate inequality in access to financial services globally. What if these regulations, which deepen this divide, are also utilized as a rationale for surveillance?
This leads to a critical question: Does the pursuit of justice justify the presence of inequality? Or, as Napoleon might ponder, do the ends truly justify the means?
Section 1.1: Justice and Inequality
Recently, we witnessed a disheartening move by PayPal, imposing a $2,500 fine for users deemed to be spreading “misinformation.” Who decides what misinformation is, and why is a payment service dictating truthfulness and, alarmingly, penalizing its users?
At first glance, this seems nonsensical. Why would anyone care about our opinions on social media? But then it struck me: it’s not about PayPal itself; it’s about the data they possess about us. Essentially, they leverage their extensive access to information to monitor and penalize users who diverge from established narratives.
Section 1.2: The KYC/AML Dilemma
Let me clarify: KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations are vital for combating online fraud. It’s essential to enforce such measures to curb illicit activities. No reasonable individual would challenge the importance of tools that help combat money laundering and fraud.
However, these regulations are also deployed to monitor the populace, ostensibly to identify potential risks—or perhaps for other motives. Under the KYC/AML framework, many appear willing to sacrifice their privacy for the sake of societal protection.
We willingly surrender our privacy, freedom of expression, and other fundamental rights, all to facilitate better detection of wrongdoing. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that between $800 billion and $2 trillion is laundered annually through criminal enterprises. This staggering sum stems from heinous crimes, including drug trafficking and human exploitation, and must be addressed.
Chapter 2: The Unbanked Crisis
Yet, in combating crime, these regulations inadvertently harm a significant segment of the population. The stringent compliance standards imposed on financial institutions by KYC/AML make it exceedingly difficult for those in underdeveloped nations—where government identity systems are often unreliable—to access even basic banking services.
Simply put, while these regulations aim to combat crime, they also serve as a formidable barrier to financial inclusion, rendering the impoverished even more destitute.
Why is banking access so crucial? Having a bank account is often the first step toward entrepreneurship or home ownership. Being unbanked severely limits personal growth, branding individuals as outsiders with little chance of success. Consider the Medium Partner Program: aspiring writers in these nations, with valuable perspectives to share, are excluded simply because they lack a Stripe account, a prerequisite that requires a retail bank account.
The emergence of cryptocurrency is a response to this issue. It represents a promising solution for nearly 1.7 billion unbanked individuals, offering them a chance to participate in the financial ecosystem alongside the rest of us.
Section 2.1: A Path Forward
So, what can be done? Some radical libertarians may advocate for complete deregulation, but I believe that eliminating KYC/AML regulations isn’t the answer. While they are effective tools against crime, we cannot allow criminals to exploit the system unchallenged.
Instead, if we cannot abolish these regulations or ease compliance requirements, we must find ways to ensure they do not prevent individuals from accessing open financial systems.
The answer lies in “pseudo-anonymous KYC.”
Chapter 3: The Promise of Blockchain
If you’ve read Bitcoin’s whitepaper, you’ll grasp its core objective: fostering a self-governing system that utilizes cryptographic proofs and a public ledger to eliminate the need for trust in intermediaries.
Bitcoin aims to bridge the gap for those left behind by traditional financial systems, enabling participation from anyone, anywhere, without central authority dictating the rules.
This can be achieved through blockchain technology, which ensures data integrity and security while maintaining accessibility. The result? A truly permissionless and trustless system where everyone can participate without scrutiny.
Why are blockchains particularly suited for KYC/AML compliance? Their inherent traceability guarantees that all transactions remain tamper-proof, making it possible to implement easier compliance measures without hampering access for those in need.
However, current blockchains alone can't resolve these issues.
Section 3.1: The Missing Piece
Blockchains are not immune to crime; they have seen a range of illicit activities, from the infamous Silk Road to various DeFi scams. So how can this technology simultaneously address KYC/AML challenges?
To achieve “pseudo-anonymous KYC/AML,” blockchain technology must integrate zero-knowledge proofs.
Zero-knowledge proofs allow individuals to demonstrate they possess certain knowledge without revealing their identity or the means by which they acquired that knowledge. This cryptographic method can bridge the gap between privacy and compliance.
By employing zero-knowledge proofs alongside innovations like soul-bound tokens, KYC requirements can be met without compromising individual privacy. Traditional KYC/AML systems rely heavily on trust and extensive personal information, while blockchain’s traceability reduces the need for such trust.
Combining KYC/AML regulations with blockchain technology offers a balanced approach: non-intrusive compliance that safeguards society against criminal activities without invading personal privacy.
In conclusion, what other technology can effectively address the shortcomings of traditional financial systems?
A Final Note
If you found this discussion enlightening, consider subscribing to my newsletter. I delve into complex topics in a digestible manner, preparing you for the future shaped by technology and crypto.
Join TheTechOasis today! Don’t hesitate to elevate your understanding.
Explore the hidden financial practices of banking giants like HSBC in this revealing video.
Watch as we explore the most painful dares in GTA 5, showcasing the game's wild side.