Section 1.1: The Life and Career of Rupert Sheldrake

Rupert Sheldrake holds a PhD in biochemistry from Cambridge and has pursued philosophy at Harvard. His tenure as a research director in cell biology and biochemistry at Cambridge showcases a robust scientific foundation, distinguishing him from many who promote pseudoscientific beliefs.

As we delve into his work on morphic resonance, this scientific background is essential. In 1981, Sheldrake published A New Science of Life, introducing the concept of "form-giving causation." He posits that "morphogenetic fields" exist in nature, functioning as information fields akin to recognized scientific concepts such as electromagnetic fields.

According to Sheldrake, just as a magnetic field influences the orientation of iron filings, a morphogenetic field—such as that of a plant—shapes its form and composition. He argues that genetic information alone cannot fully account for the complexity of living organisms, identifying several gaps in the current evolutionary theory.

Subsection 1.1.1: The Challenge to Evolutionary Theory

Sheldrake contends that the current understanding of evolution does not adequately explain the emergence of complex structures like proteins, which are critical to life. Statistically, the likelihood of such intricate proteins forming spontaneously through natural selection seems almost impossible. If a mixture of proteins did occur in the distant past, questions arise about why this particular combination survived and how similar structures could repeatedly emerge over time.

This leads us to Sheldrake's notion of morphogenetic fields, which he believes encompass all systems. These fields store information specific to each system and resonate with similar fields—indicating that systems with analogous forms can influence one another. For instance, two individuals' morphogenetic fields might resonate, while those of a human and a flower would not.

Thus, the resonance phenomenon suggests that existing morphogenetic fields influence the formation of future systems, acting as shaping causes.

Section 1.2: The Impact of Science Delusion

With the publication of Science Delusion, Sheldrake ignited a substantial public discourse in Great Britain. In this work, he critiques the traditional scientific establishment, accusing it of dogmatism and an almost religious adherence to established theories. He claims that mainstream science largely ignores his findings on extrasensory abilities, such as telepathy, despite their validation through numerous experiments.

While some may dispute Sheldrake's claims, he asserts that even some respected experts in quantum mechanics advocate for further investigation into his hypotheses. He highlights a critical flaw in established science: the tendency to dismiss unconventional theories rather than rigorously testing them.

Now, I leave it to you to form your own judgment regarding Sheldrake's ideas. Science thrives on independent thought rather than mere acceptance of consensus.

In this insightful video, Rupert Sheldrake discusses his views on scientism and morphic resonance, exploring the implications for our understanding of consciousness.

In this banned TED Talk, Sheldrake challenges prevailing scientific dogmas and presents his research on phenomena often dismissed by the mainstream scientific community.

René Junge, an author, shares his insights on ILLUMINATION. For weekly updates and to stay informed about new articles, subscribe [here](http://bit.ly/ReneJunge).