Exploring the Intersection of God, Mathematics, and Technology
Written on
Chapter 1: The Divine Discovery
In September, a plugin developer named Aleksey Vaneev made a remarkable assertion: while creating an algorithm for a white noise generator, he believed he uncovered a theoretical proof of God's existence. He shared his findings on GitHub, stating:
"I've seemingly stumbled upon a 'backdoor' in the realm of mathematics. The implications of this discovery are debatable, and I'm not imposing any specific interpretations, but rather drawing my own conclusions..."
To illustrate his claims, he even shared an animated visualization of his code on YouTube:
How could someone assert they've discovered a proof of God while developing a white noise generator? Let's delve into the insights provided in his GitHub README file:
Historically, cryptography has relied on permutations intertwined with various mathematical operations, as most hashes and ciphers utilize such constructs. Vaneev sought a fresh perspective by investigating how mathematical entropy could influence hashing. This led him to assert he found a "backdoor."
He elaborates in detail in the README, ultimately concluding (emphasized words are mine):
"In the author's view, the program 'reads data' directly from the entropy pool, which is 'embedded' into mathematics from its inception, akin to any mathematical constant (like π). This raises a provocative and perhaps contentious proposition: 'intelligent impulses' or even the 'human mind' (as a musician might perceive these impulses) existed long before the 'Big Bang' occurred. This revelation could be the most significant, yet unsettling, discovery in human history, as it raises profound questions that delve into religious territory."
These findings from the 1-bit PRVHASH suggest that if abstract mathematics encompasses not only a framework for manipulating numbers and variables but also contains fixed, readable information, then mathematics doesn't merely "exist" but has "formed," as it doesn't evolve aside from human discoveries of new rules and patterns. Since physical processes adhere to mathematical principles, this implies that a Creator or Higher Intelligence exists in relation to the universe. For the author, this conclusion is definitive.
Personally, I've often pondered the implications of constants on the existence of an immensely high intelligence at the core of everything, making this concept quite intriguing.
You don't necessarily need to comprehend the intricacies of his code to agree or disagree with his conclusion. At its essence, he argues that since mathematics is static and predates the universe's inception, it must have been in place prior to the Big Bang and, by logical extension, must have been intentionally created.
It's worth noting that one could argue against his conclusion, but to do so successfully, your premise must be sound. This isn't an isolated instance.
Francis Collins, the leader of the Human Genome Project and a recent director for the National Institutes of Health, was so struck by the intricate, logical design of DNA that he co-founded a Christian advocacy organization called Biologos, promoting the link between God and science.
I’m not overly familiar with Biologos, aside from their efforts to counter fundamentalist ideologies, which I appreciate. They advocate for evolution as a divine process, dispelling the notion of a literal six-day creation.
Collins now serves as President Biden's science advisor, and I can only imagine the fascinating discussions they might have while sharing a drink and throwing darts at a Marjorie Taylor Greene dartboard.
Collins, among others, posits that God’s communication—His true language—manifests through science and mathematics, both of which are immutable aspects of our universe, in contrast to the domains they govern, such as biological constructs and evolution.
However, the term "intelligent design" has been misappropriated by extreme fundamentalists to promote a narrative of a malevolent God, which does not reflect the static truth: God, as portrayed throughout the Bible, simply "is." Moreover, the original Hebrew descriptions of God were gender-neutral, as I’ve recently learned from sources like Sarah Ruden's excellent translation of the Gospel.
Yet, patriarchal religious leaders historically framed God as male, assigning the pronoun that has become ingrained in our lexicon.
It's important to recognize that the interpretation of God shaped by the patriarchal Christian empire significantly diminished the feminine essence of early churches following Jesus's crucifixion.
Christianity has faced significant challenges since then.
The concept of God being male is as implausible as a man being a God. Nevertheless, some individuals continue to create self-aggrandizing narratives.
For 2,000 years, Christianity has largely perpetuated a culture of judgment and hatred rather than love. Current statistics indicate that a majority of people in Europe and North America now reject Christianity.
Section 1.1: The Mathematical Nature of Existence
Reflecting on the nature of existence, one could question whether the God represented in mathematics is a harsh being.
During my time in Chicago, I encountered a news story about a devoted father who drove his young daughter from Wisconsin to downtown Chicago for a test, braving inclement weather. He patiently waited outside while she took her exam. Tragically, while he awaited her return, he was fatally injured by a falling shard of ice from a skyscraper.
As Jimmy Stewart famously said in "It's a Wonderful Life," perhaps that was the consequence of his prayers.
However, he wasn't a victim of divine cruelty or a grim sense of humor. Instead, he fell prey to the laws of mathematics governing physics and chemistry, which dictate the likelihood of ice falling from a building after a storm. Such incidents occur frequently, but only make headlines when they result in injury or death. It is merely a matter of probability.
If early humans had relied on sheer luck to create fire, we would not have advanced to splitting atoms or developing vaccines. Instead, we would still be dodging wild animals.
Primitive humans occasionally set forests ablaze while mastering their newfound skills, but that was not a divine fault; it was simply a lack of understanding of physics.
Currently, we find ourselves on a path of environmental destruction, but again, this is not the fault of a higher power.
Chapter 2: The Cosmic Perspective
As we exist in a universe that continually expands, comments made within articles about the remarkable James Webb Telescope often resonate:
"I maintain that the greatest challenge to traditional religious beliefs is the Webb Telescope. Why would a deity create countless celestial objects and vast distances while placing His followers on a minuscule speck of dust? Surely, God does not favor America over other nations, nor does He prioritize Earth over the cosmos."
The answer is clear: God does not show favoritism. If there are other sentient beings in the universe—of which I believe there are—they likely have their own conception of God. Just as you might, and as dolphins might perceive their own version of divinity, perhaps not recognizing Jesus Christ if he were to appear before them.
I recall a friend humorously asserting that his God was Mr. Potato Head; while he believed in a higher power, he struggled to embrace Christianity fully.
Section 2.1: The Role of Christ
What about Christ in this discourse, especially given the hatred humans have often propagated in His name? Personally, I believe we inhabit a quantum universe. If one chooses to believe in Christ, that is a personal choice with no adverse consequences, and He will reveal Himself accordingly.
I do not subscribe to the notion of a jealous God depicted in the Old Testament. If Mr. Potato Head represents your faith, I don't believe you will face eternal damnation. The Holy Spirit of Christ will persistently seek to draw you into His presence, but if you resist, He will love you regardless. Notably, you need not even hold that belief.
The real repercussions of disbelief manifest in our earthly existence, though these are not by design. The failure to harness the immense power of a benevolent God has tangible consequences, but this is not the result of a spiteful deity.
Not engaging with the vast potential of a universe created by a loving God is unwise, but ultimately, it is a choice.
It isn't about submissively bowing to a superior being, as fundamentalist zealots would have us believe. Rather, it is about leveraging the power of a being capable of creating a magnificent universe that we can never fully comprehend.
Neglecting this opportunity is akin to choosing to remain cold in your home without turning on the heater. While you have the freedom to do so, you may suffer the consequences.
This is a fundamental principle of physics. Blaming God may provide temporary solace, but it won't alleviate your discomfort. Just activate the heater.
Notes:
If you're passionate about music, consider exploring Vaneev's products here:
Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this content, I invite you to check out my debut novel, MagicLand. It's an enjoyable read for all ages, offering a hopeful message within a dystopian setting.