The Future of Tesla's 4680 Battery: A Game Changer on the Horizon
Written on
The Evolution of Tesla's 4680 Battery
Prepare for an exciting update — the Tesla 4680 battery might be on the verge of achieving its full potential. Initially hailed as revolutionary, the 4680 has been somewhat disappointing. While its larger size and structural pack design have made it one of the most cost-effective lithium-ion batteries available, competitors like BYD and CATL have quickly caught up by mimicking this approach. The exceptional specifications and low prices that Elon Musk promised have yet to materialize, but recent developments suggest a significant breakthrough may be imminent. So, what's changed?
To understand the current situation, let’s revisit Musk’s original promises regarding the 4680 battery. During Tesla's Battery Day, he and his team claimed that the 4680 would feature a larger size, a tabless design, a high-nickel, zero-cobalt cathode, a pure silicon anode, and a dry coating technique. These innovations were projected to reduce costs dramatically—by 56% compared to Tesla's existing 21700 cells, bringing the price down to around $60 per kWh. In comparison, the industry average has fluctuated between $132 and $151 per kWh. The anticipated benefits also included an impressive energy density of nearly 300 Wh/kg and rapid charging times of just 15 minutes to go from 10% to 80% charge, which is roughly half the time required for current Tesla models.
At present, the 4680 batteries being produced barely reflect these innovative features. While they do incorporate the larger form factor and structural pack, leading to lower production costs of about $104 per kWh, they still use a graphite anode and a low-nickel cathode that contains cobalt. This combination results in a disappointing energy density of 244 Wh/kg, which falls short of the 296 Wh/kg offered by the 21700 cells they aim to replace. Additionally, charging from 10% to 80% takes approximately 30 minutes, significantly longer than promised. The absence of dry coating, a key factor in reducing production costs, further hampers the battery's potential.
What has hindered the 4680 from achieving its promised capabilities? High-nickel cathodes can be unstable and sensitive to high temperatures, which could reduce their lifespan if not applied correctly. Likewise, silicon anodes expand when they absorb lithium ions during charging, which can lead to increased internal pressure and potential cell damage over time. Because electric vehicles (EVs) require a reliable battery with a long lifespan, Tesla must ensure the correct application of high-nickel cathodes and silicon anodes before introducing them to consumers. Otherwise, they risk facing extremely expensive recalls if their vehicles malfunction prematurely.
Moreover, the dry coating process still needs refinement before it can be implemented for mass production. Most lithium-ion battery production lines employ a wet coating method, which involves applying a wet chemical mixture to the anode and cathode during manufacturing. This mixture must then be dried before the cells can be assembled, consuming considerable factory space and energy. Tesla's acquisition of Maxwell, a company that pioneered a dry coating method, was aimed at eliminating this drying step, thereby increasing factory efficiency and reducing costs. However, the dry coating process remains highly unreliable; while it works well for small batches, scaling it up poses significant challenges, making it financially unviable for large-scale production.
Tesla is in a precarious position. Achieving the specifications and pricing for the Cybertruck is contingent on successful 4680 production. The Cybertruck has faced delays not due to production issues but because Tesla has been focused on perfecting the 4680 battery. This has frustrated reservation holders and allowed competitors in both the battery and EV markets to catch up, particularly in China and Europe, where models like the Polestar 2 are now offering superior specs at lower prices.
The Cybertruck and Model Y are expected to be pivotal in Tesla's quest for EV dominance. It has been disheartening for many, including myself, to witness what seems to be a stall in 4680 development. However, recent leaks and developments suggest this may not be the case.
According to CleanTechnica, a credible source for Tesla news, progress on dry coating is reportedly "on track." They have apparently resolved issues related to the anode's dry coating, although challenges remain with the cathode. If true, this could mean that Tesla's pilot production line for dry coating will be finalized soon, making the prospect of sub-$100 per kWh battery packs a reality.
Additionally, Tesla has partnered with L&F Co. to procure high-nickel cathodes, indicating they have resolved the application issues for the 4680 cells. Reports suggest that Tesla's next-generation 4680 will feature a 90% nickel cathode, which should enhance energy density and charging speeds. However, the goal of utilizing pure silicon anodes remains elusive. Nonetheless, LG, which is producing 4680s for Tesla to help ramp up production, has started scaling up its version of the 4680, rumored to include high-nickel cathodes and a silicon-doped anode. While this may not fully deliver the promised charging speeds, it represents a significant improvement over the current 4680 cells.
On a positive note, pure silicon anodes are becoming more attainable for Tesla. A few years ago, they were only seen in experimental lab batteries due to manufacturing challenges. However, companies like Enovix have successfully addressed these issues with straightforward engineering solutions, such as robust battery encasements and pre-lithiation, making it possible to produce pure silicon anodes on a commercial scale.
In conclusion, within the next couple of years, we could see Tesla rolling out 4680 cells that fulfill 90% of Musk's promises. This would position them well ahead of competitors, potentially allowing their EVs to be thousands of dollars cheaper while offering faster charging and extended ranges. Ultimately, this could enhance Tesla's profitability, even as they already boast some of the most lucrative EVs on the market.
I've consistently emphasized the urgency for Musk to finalize and scale 4680 production as competitors close in on Tesla's lead. While I might wish to think my advice has been influential, the reality is that this is the logical step for Tesla to not only maintain but also expand its advantage. Therefore, stay tuned; Tesla may dominate the EV landscape for much longer than many anticipated.
This video discusses the significant changes surrounding Tesla's 4680 battery, exploring the technological advancements and potential impacts on the electric vehicle industry.
In this video, witness the launch of SpaceX's Falcon Heavy carrying a Tesla Roadster, commemorating the fifth anniversary of its maiden flight.